,

450+ custodial deaths, four tenders, yet no CCTV: HC puts top brass on notice

The High Court of Jharkhand has summoned replies from top state officials over non-installation of CCTV cameras in police stations.
Photo: AI Image
Font
Theme

More than 450 custodial deaths since 2018, four rounds of tendering and repeated court directions have failed to ensure the installation of CCTV cameras in police stations across Jharkhand, prompting the high court to issue show-cause notices to the state’s top officials.

A division bench of Chief Justice M S Sonak and Justice Manoj Prasad on Thursday sought explanations from the Chief Secretary, Home Secretary and Director General of Police (DGP), asking why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for failing to comply with the court’s orders. The officials have been directed to file their replies before the next hearing on October 15.

The court expressed displeasure over the government’s failure to implement its directions, observing that the state appeared unwilling to comply and was attempting to delay the matter instead of placing the actual position before the court through an affidavit.

‘CCTV an essential safeguard’

During the hearing, the bench referred to the state’s record of more than 450 custodial deaths since 2018 and questioned why CCTV surveillance remained absent from police stations despite repeated judicial directions.

The court observed that CCTV cameras are not merely a technological facility but an essential safeguard for people in custody, helping monitor police action and ensure accountability. It termed the continued failure to install them deeply unfortunate.

The bench also questioned why the government had failed to implement the system despite initiating the tender process four times. It took strong exception to the DGP attributing responsibility for CCTV installation to the home department, describing the response as irresponsible.

Court criticises ‘evasive’ affidavit

The bench further criticised the state’s affidavit, observing that it appeared to evade the actual issue rather than disclose the status of implementation.

The court indicated that failure to comply with judicial directions, coupled with the non-disclosure of the actual position, warranted fixing accountability on the officials concerned.

The DGP had previously faced a contempt notice in the matter, with the court seeking an explanation for non-compliance with its earlier directions.

Case stems from alleged custodial assault

The proceedings originated from a complaint alleging the custodial assault of Tarun Mahto, a former Ichagarh Assembly candidate, following which the high court took suo motu cognisance.

Mahto, who contested the 2024 Assembly election on a Jharkhand Loktantrik Krantikari Morcha ticket, was allegedly taken to Ichagarh police station on the night of November 19, 2025, where he was subjected to assault and “third-degree” treatment, according to the complaint.

His wife subsequently wrote to the Chief Justice alleging custodial torture, prompting the court to initiate proceedings.

Author

  • Bedanti Saran

    Bedanti Saran is a reporter at The Guardian Chronicle, covering national and regional news across Jharkhand and India.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *